<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JRuby, Rails and Statics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/</link>
	<description>C#, .NET, Ruby, Rails, book reviews, mind hacks, Wing Chun and the occasional personal bit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Hey Sudhindra,

Thanks for your comment. You could indeed store data in a file and it sounds great for a counter. I&#039;m thinking it would be less fun for a cache though, as the cache could easily be multi-megabytes in size - ie, in need of indexing similar. It would also have more speed overhead than in memory with the disk reads, especially if the file was stored on a network drive rather than local (as in some production deployment environments).

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sudhindra,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. You could indeed store data in a file and it sounds great for a counter. I'm thinking it would be less fun for a cache though, as the cache could easily be multi-megabytes in size - ie, in need of indexing similar. It would also have more speed overhead than in memory with the disk reads, especially if the file was stored on a network drive rather than local (as in some production deployment environments).</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kedzierski</title>
		<link>http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kedzierski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure one of the built-in caching mechanisms in Rails is to write out static html pages which then get served up by the web server directly. Though, if you want to cache certain values only, your approach seems useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm pretty sure one of the built-in caching mechanisms in Rails is to write out static html pages which then get served up by the web server directly. Though, if you want to cache certain values only, your approach seems useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudhindra Rao</title>
		<link>http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhindra Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescrisp.org/2007/09/09/jruby-rails-and-statics/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>James, 
How about using a file to store your static data? In Ruby every time you change that static number or data just update that file. I had done that for a php app once for implementing page hit counters.

Sudhindra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,<br />
How about using a file to store your static data? In Ruby every time you change that static number or data just update that file. I had done that for a php app once for implementing page hit counters.</p>
<p>Sudhindra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

